Securiti vs UniConsent
UniConsent
CMP for first-party data and ad consent
Publishers using it: 3 · incl. Search Engine Journal, Scrabble Solver
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Securiti scores 2.6/5 and UniConsent scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent consent management platforms (cmps) benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are latency & page-load impact (Securiti 3.0, UniConsent 4.2) and cross-device & app consent sync (Securiti 2.5, UniConsent 3.5); they are within 0.3 on 2 of 10 criteria.
- Securiti is built for enterprise publishers; UniConsent for small and mid-market.
- On total cost of ownership Securiti scores 2.1 and UniConsent 3.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 1 publishers use Securiti and 3 use UniConsent.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
UniConsent is stronger on latency & Page-Load Impact (4.2 vs 3.0), cross-Device & App Consent Sync (3.5 vs 2.5), ad Recovery & Vendor Gating (3.0 vs 2.2) and CMS & Tag Manager Integration (3.8 vs 3.0).
Which one fits
Choose Securiti if…
- You publish at enterprise scale.
- You weight global Privacy Regulation Coverage (GDPR/CCPA/LGPD), first-Party Data & Preference Center Enablement and support, Documentation & Implementation heavily — Securiti leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose UniConsent if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight latency & Page-Load Impact, cross-Device & App Consent Sync and CMS & Tag Manager Integration heavily — UniConsent leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Securiti and UniConsent in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 3.0CookiebotCookie consent and compliance automationRead review
- 3.2KetchPrivacy and consent as a data assetRead review
- 3.5OneTrustMake Governance Work at the Speed and Scale of AI.Read review
- 2.9TrustArcPrivacy compliance and consent managementRead review
All 9 scored tools are in Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Head to head
| Criterion | Securiti | UniConsent |
|---|---|---|
| IAB TCF v2.2 Compliance & Ad-Tech Signal Propagation14% of capability | 3.2 | 3.8 |
| Consent Capture UX & Opt-In Rate Optimization12% of capability | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| First-Party Data & Preference Center Enablement12% of capability | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| Global Privacy Regulation Coverage (GDPR/CCPA/LGPD)12% of capability | 4.2 | 3.8 |
| Google Consent Mode v2 Integration12% of capability | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| CMS & Tag Manager Integration10% of capability | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| Ad Recovery & Vendor Gating8% of capability | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| Cross-Device & App Consent Sync8% of capability | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Latency & Page-Load Impact6% of capability | 3.0 | 4.2 |
| Support, Documentation & Implementation6% of capability | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.2 | 3.6 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 2.1 | 3.6 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Securiti | UniConsent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 1.0 | 4.5 |
| Entry cost | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| Implementation cost | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Ongoing cost | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Securiti pricing
Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote.
UniConsent pricing
Basic £20/month (up to 300,000 users, 3 websites); Value £50/month (500,000 users, 5 websites or 1 app); Pro £200/month (2M users); Enterprise on quote. Extra usage £100 per additional 1M users; no free plan.
What users say
Securiti
4 positive · 0 neutral · 1 negative
UniConsent
1 positive · 1 neutral · 1 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Securiti scores 2.6 and UniConsent scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/securiti/uniconsent, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Securiti and UniConsent differ?
UniConsent is stronger on latency & Page-Load Impact (4.2 vs 3.0), cross-Device & App Consent Sync (3.5 vs 2.5), ad Recovery & Vendor Gating (3.0 vs 2.2) and CMS & Tag Manager Integration (3.8 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Securiti or UniConsent?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Securiti scores 2.1/5 and UniConsent scores 3.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers. See alternatives to Securiti or alternatives to UniConsent.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers
Every scored tool in Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers.
