Gracker.ai vs News Exposure
Gracker.ai
AI search visibility and citation tracking that separates authoritative source citations from passing brand mentions
Publishers using it: 1
News Exposure
Specialized broadcast and print media monitoring platform with extensive high-definition archives
Publishers using it: —
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Gracker.ai scores 2.3/5 and News Exposure scores 2.3/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent media monitoring & AI visibility tools benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are ai answer & llm citation tracking (Gracker.ai 4.8, News Exposure 0.5) and source coverage (Gracker.ai 1.2, News Exposure 4.6); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
- Gracker.ai is built for mid-market publishers; News Exposure for mid-market and enterprise.
- On total cost of ownership Gracker.ai scores 3.4 and News Exposure 1.2 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 1 publishers use Gracker.ai and 0 use News Exposure.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Gracker.ai is stronger on AI answer & LLM citation tracking (4.8 vs 0.5) and share of voice & competitive benchmarking (4.6 vs 2.8).
News Exposure is stronger on source coverage (4.6 vs 1.2) and reporting & dashboards (4.0 vs 2.2).
Which one fits
Choose Gracker.ai if…
- You publish at mid-market scale.
- You weight AI answer & LLM citation tracking, share of voice & competitive benchmarking and integrations & export heavily — Gracker.ai leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose News Exposure if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight source coverage, reporting & dashboards and accuracy & relevance filtering heavily — News Exposure leads on those in this benchmark.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Gracker.ai · 1
News Exposure · 0
No publisher adoption verified yet.
Head to head
| Criterion | Gracker.ai | News Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Source coverage14% of capability | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| Accuracy & relevance filtering12% of capability | 3.0 | 4.2 |
| AI answer & LLM citation tracking12% of capability | 4.8 | 0.5 |
| Content licensing & data compliance10% of capability | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| Reporting & dashboards10% of capability | 2.2 | 4.0 |
| Share of voice & competitive benchmarking10% of capability | 4.6 | 2.8 |
| Integrations & export8% of capability | 3.5 | 2.0 |
| Real-time alerting8% of capability | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Sentiment & portrayal analysis8% of capability | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Usability8% of capability | 2.8 | 2.6 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.4 | 1.2 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Gracker.ai | News Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.0 | 0.8 |
| Entry cost | 3.5 | 0.8 |
| Implementation cost | 4.0 | 1.9 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| Ongoing cost | 3.0 | 1.5 |
Gracker.ai pricing
Starter $99/month ($79/month billed annually); Scale $499/month ($399/month billed annually); Enterprise custom. 7-day trial, card required.
News Exposure pricing
Custom pricing; quotes are provided based on specific monitoring needs, market reach, and reporting depth.
What users say
Gracker.ai
11 positive · 2 neutral · 0 negative
News Exposure
3 positive · 1 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Gracker.ai scores 2.3 and News Exposure scores 2.3 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/gracker/news-exposure, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Gracker.ai and News Exposure differ?
Gracker.ai is stronger on AI answer & LLM citation tracking (4.8 vs 0.5) and share of voice & competitive benchmarking (4.6 vs 2.8). News Exposure is stronger on source coverage (4.6 vs 1.2) and reporting & dashboards (4.0 vs 2.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Gracker.ai or News Exposure?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Gracker.ai scores 3.4/5 and News Exposure scores 1.2/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools. See alternatives to Gracker.ai or alternatives to News Exposure.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Still deciding? Build your stack — four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack, with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools.
